Талмуд к Даниэль 5:7
קָרֵ֤א מַלְכָּא֙ בְּחַ֔יִל לְהֶֽעָלָה֙ לְאָ֣שְׁפַיָּ֔א כשדיא [כַּשְׂדָּאֵ֖י] וְגָזְרַיָּ֑א עָנֵ֨ה מַלְכָּ֜א וְאָמַ֣ר ׀ לְחַכִּימֵ֣י בָבֶ֗ל דִּ֣י כָל־אֱ֠נָשׁ דִּֽי־יִקְרֵ֞ה כְּתָבָ֣ה דְנָ֗ה וּפִשְׁרֵהּ֙ יְחַוִּנַּ֔נִי אַרְגְּוָנָ֣א יִלְבַּ֗שׁ והמונכא [וְהַֽמְנִיכָ֤א] דִֽי־דַהֲבָא֙ עַֽל־צַוְּארֵ֔הּ וְתַלְתִּ֥י בְמַלְכוּתָ֖א יִשְׁלַֽט׃ (ס)
Царь громко закричал, чтобы ввести чародеев, халдеев и астрологов. Царь сказал и сказал мудрецам Вавилона:'Всякий, кто прочтет это письмо и объявит мне его толкование, будет одет в пурпур, с золотой цепью на шее и будет править одним из трех в царстве.'
Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat
“One may go out with an expert amulet whether written or based on herbs, on condition that it be put neither in a chain nor in a ring.”125As Babli and Tosephta explain, since chain and ring are forbidden, people would not realize that one wears them for a legitimate purpose. They asked before Rebbi Jonathan, may it be put in a tube? He answered him, “on condition that it be put neither in a chain nor in a ring.” They asked before Rebbi Jonathan, may one go out with a necklace? He said, because of jewelry. If because of jewelry, Daniel should have prohibited, and a golden necklace around his neck126Dan. 5:7. Since Daniel accepted the golden chain he must have worn it also on the Sabbath.. If127Babylonian spelling; the Yerushalmi form would have been אין. because of a load on the Sabbath, we may say128Babylonian spelling; the Yerushalmi form would have been נימר. that anything connected to a garment is like a garment.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy