Komentaryo sa Levitico 10:18: Rashi, Rashbam, Siftei Chakhamim & Rav Hirsch

הֵ֚ן לֹא־הוּבָ֣א אֶת־דָּמָ֔הּ אֶל־הַקֹּ֖דֶשׁ פְּנִ֑ימָה אָכ֨וֹל תֹּאכְל֥וּ אֹתָ֛הּ בַּקֹּ֖דֶשׁ כַּאֲשֶׁ֥ר צִוֵּֽיתִי׃

Narito, hindi dinala ang dugo nito sa loob ng Santuwaryo; tiyak na dapat sana ninyo itong kinain sa banal na lugar, gaya ng iniutos ko.”

Rashi

'הן לא הובא וגו‎ BEHOLD [THE BLOOD OF IT] WAS NOT BROUGHT [IN WITHIN THE HOLY PLACE] — for if it had been brought,then indeed was it your duty to burn it, as it is said (Leviticus 6:23) “Any sin-offering whereof any of the blood is brought [into the appointed tent, … shall not be eaten; it shall be burnt in the fire]” (Zevachim 101a; Pesachim 82a);
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashbam

הן לא הובא את דמה אל הקדש פנימה, into the sanctuary; all sin offers whose blood is destined for the golden altar or dividing curtain must be burned as has been made clear in Leviticus 6,23. None of it must be eaten by the priests. However, the sin offering under discussion is one whose blood was sprinkled on the copper altar in the courtyard of the Tabernacle.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Siftei Chakhamim

You should have. It does not mean they should eat it now, as the expression implies, since it was already burnt.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

אכל תאכלו אתה YE SHOULD INDEED HAVE EATEN IT although you were Onanim,
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

כאשר צויתי AS I COMMANDED you in the case of the meal-offering (vv. 12, 13).
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy