Kabbalah sa Exodo 3:2: Zohar

וַ֠יֵּרָא מַלְאַ֨ךְ יְהֹוָ֥ה אֵלָ֛יו בְּלַבַּת־אֵ֖שׁ מִתּ֣וֹךְ הַסְּנֶ֑ה וַיַּ֗רְא וְהִנֵּ֤ה הַסְּנֶה֙ בֹּעֵ֣ר בָּאֵ֔שׁ וְהַסְּנֶ֖ה אֵינֶ֥נּוּ אֻכָּֽל׃

At ang anghel ng Walang-Hanggan ay nagpakita sa kaniya sa isang liyab ng apoy mula sa gitna ng isang mababang matinik na halaman; at tumingin siya, at narito, ang matinik na halaman ay nagliliyab sa apoy, ngunit ang matinik na halaman ay hindi natutupok.

Zohar

R. Isaac said: ‘Why, in one place in the Psalms does it say “The angel of the Lord encampeth round about them that fear him and delivereth them” (Ps. 34, 8), in the singular, and in another place, “For he will give his angels charge over thee” (Ibid. 91, 11), in the plural? The reason is that the term “angels” is a reference to angels proper, whereas in the verse: “The angel of the Lord encampeth”, the reference is to the Shekinah, as in the verse: “And the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush” (Ex. 3, 2). Thus “the angel of the Lord encampeth round about those who fear him” to deliver them; and when the Shekinah abides within a man, ever so many holy legions rally round him.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Zohar

Happy was the lot of the faithful prophet Moses, for what is it that we read concerning him? “And an angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush” (Ex. 3, 2). The bush was indeed in that region of holiness and clave to it, for all things cleave to one another, the pure and the impure, there is no purity except through impurity;
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Zohar

Said R. Eleazar: ‘Assuredly, it is so.’
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy