Komentaryong Sumisipi para sa Genesis 27:40

וְעַל־חַרְבְּךָ֣ תִֽחְיֶ֔ה וְאֶת־אָחִ֖יךָ תַּעֲבֹ֑ד וְהָיָה֙ כַּאֲשֶׁ֣ר תָּרִ֔יד וּפָרַקְתָּ֥ עֻלּ֖וֹ מֵעַ֥ל צַוָּארֶֽךָ׃

At sa iyong tabak ka mabubuhay, at paglilingkuran mo ang iyong kapatid; ngunit mangyayari, kapag ikaw ay nagdamdam, na babaklasin mo ang kanyang pamatok mula sa iyong leeg.”

Ramban

AND IF HIS OFFERING BE A SACRIFICE OF PEACE-OFFERINGS: IF HE OFFER OF THE HERD, WHETHER MALE OR FEMALE. The reason why the burnt-offering may only be male,235Above, Chapter 1, Verses 3 and 10. whereas in the case of the peace-offering it can be male or female, and the sin-offering must only be female,236Further, 4:28. This applies only to the sin-offering of an ordinary individual. See further on in the text for the sin-offering of the prince (4:23). is very clear, since the olah (the burnt-offering) is as its name indicates, [i.e., “ascension” — being that it reaches above all Divine attributes], whilst sh’lamim (the peace-offering) is of the expressions: and all My pleasures ‘yashlim’ (he will perform — literally: he will “perfect”);237Isaiah 44:28. ‘avanim sh’leimoth’ (whole stones).238Deuteronomy 27:6. Since the peace-offering is brought in order to bring peace into the world, it performs the function of harmonizing all attributes, such as justice and mercy. Hence it may be brought from the male or female (Ricanti). See my Hebrew commentary, p. 19; also Note 240 further. The sin-offering is in order to appease Him with the present that goeth before239Genesis 32:21. Him. I have already written on this matter.240Ibid., 46:1 (Vol. I, p. 542): “Jacob offered peace-offerings in order to bring all Divine attributes into accord towards him …”. See also ibid., 32:21 (pp. 402-403). The guilt-offering must be a male,241Further, Chapter 5, Verses 15 and 25. because the sin-offering is brought for those transgressions [for which, if committed wilfully, the sinner] incurs the penalty of excision, in order that the spirit return unto G-d who gave it,242Ecclesiastes 12:7. but the guilt-offering is not brought for those transgressions for which [if committed wilfully] one incurs excision, and therefore it is as if it were for a pleasing odor just like the burnt-offering.243Hence just like the burnt-offering is a male [for the reason explained above], so is the guilt-offering. The sin-offering of the prince is a he-goat,244Further, 4:23; although the sin-offering of a common person is a female, as explained above. because the prince is the sovereign unto whom judgment [rightfully] belongs,245See Ezekiel 21:32. and he fights the battles of G-d and lives by his sword;246See Genesis 27:40. therefore his offering is the same as the he-goat brought in case of idol-worship [by the congregation].247Numbers 15:24.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rav Hirsch

חיה על־ vergl. ועל חרבך תחיה (Bereschit 27, 40), wo das Schwert die Basis bildet, auf welcher Esaw seine Existenz finden wird. Ebenso (Ezech. 33, 19): ובשוב רשע מרשעתו ועשה משפט וצדקה עליהם הוא יחיה, das Recht und die Pflicht, zu welcher der Gesetzlose zurückkehrt, bilden eine Basis, auf welcher er das Dasein wieder findet, dessen er durch seine Pflichtvergessenheit verlustig geworden war.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Chizkuni

לרחוץ על היאור, “to bathe in the waters of the river; other examples of the word על meaning “in,” instead of “on, or above,” are found in: Genesis 27,40 על חרבך תחיה, “you will live with the use of your sword.” Also Exodus 12,7: על הבתים אשר יאכלו אותו בהם, “in the houses that they will eat it in.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

and You have given them to drink tears in large measure Heb. שליש. In Babylon, where they were for seventy years, a third (שליש) of the two hundred and ten of Egypt. I learned this from the work of Rabbi Moshe Hadarshan. It may also be interpreted as regards the kingdom of Greece, which represents the third trouble. If you ask, is that [not] the fourth, because Persia and Media came before, all the seventy years of the Babylonian exile are only one exile. Menachem (p. 175) interprets שליש as the name of a drinking vessel. So he explained (Isa. 40:12): “and He measured with a ‘shalish’ the dust of the earth.” Our Sages explained it (Mid. Ps. 80: 4) as referring to the three tears that Esau shed, concerning whom it is said (Gen. 27:34): “and he cried a cry.” That is one. “A great one.” That is two. “And a bitter one.” That is three. Because of them, he merited to live by his sword, as it is said (Gen. 27:40): “and it will come to pass when you complain, etc.”
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy