Mga Kaugnay na Sipi sa Levitico 19:12

If he transgressed and offered [a vow], how is that in the opinion of the House of Shammai? Let us hear from the following: “The House of Shammai say, his wife is permitted but his children are forbidden.” That means, if he transgressed and offered [a vow], in the opinion of the House of Shammai he is permitted¹⁰⁷It seems that since his wife is permitted even following his voluntary addition of his children, that this addition has no influence on the rest of the vow. (R. David Fraenckel emends the text from “permitted” to “prohibited”.). They wanted to say, vows but not oaths. It was found stated: Rebbi Ismael says, “¹⁰⁸Lev. 19:12. It seems that the argument is based on the second half of the verse, not quoted in the text: "for you would desecrate your God's Name, I am the Eternal". It is general rabbinic doctrine that the note "I am the Eternal" at the end of a verse indicates that a transgression depends on the intention, that God will judge whether a person intended evil or not (Sifra Qedošim Parašah 2(14). This means that when clearly no desecration of the Name is intended, the oath cannot be forbidden.do not swear falsely in My Name,” you may swear to assessors and to people who condemn property and to toll collectors.