Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Exodo 3:18: Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim

⁵¹Tosephta 2:10, a slightly different version in the Babli, Baba Batra 8a, Sanhedrin 112a.“A person who makes a vow ‘to forbid himself the people of the town,’ if another person came and dwelled there for thirty days, [the vower] is permitted to deal with him. ‘From the inhabitants of the town,’ if another person came and dwelled there for thirty days, [the vower] is prohibited from dealing with him.⁵²“People of the town” are its taxpayers. The obligation to pay local taxes starts only with a residence of 12 months. “Town dwellers” are those who have to contribute to the local welfare fund. That obligation starts after thirty days.” ‘A qônām that the people of my town cannot have any usufruct from me,’ he cannot ask the local rabbi⁵³Since he is an interested party.. ‘The usufruct of the people of my town [is forbidden] to me’, he can ask the local rabbi. Some Tannaïm state, even in the first case he can ask, for it does not mean that [the rabbi] would dissolve his own vow⁵⁴The rabbi does not have to disqualify himself since formally he is only forbidden to dissolve his own vows and it is probably embarrassing to him to deal with a person who makes that kind of vow.. A vow of the community cannot be dissolved⁵⁵This is generally agreed on (Babli Giṭṭin 36a, Makkot 16a); since voter rolls change continuously, it is impossible to get all people who voted for the vow together to ask for dissolution.. A vow made in public cannot be dissolved⁵⁶The Babli, Giṭṭin 36a, decides against this.. ⁵⁷Tosephta 2:10.“If somebody made a vow that another should not have usufruct from him, if the vow was made in the other’s presence, he can request the vow to be dissolved only in the other’s presence; if the vow was not made in the other’s presence, he can request the dissolution either in the other’s presence or in his absence.” Rebbi Joḥanan said, because of the shame; Rebbi Joshua ben Levi said, because of the suspicion⁵⁸R. Joḥanan feels that the maker of an inappropriate vow should be shamed, R. Joshua ben Levi requires the other party to be present lest he thought that the vower broke his vow. The Babli, 65a, disagrees and holds that the rule is biblical. Since Moses had sworn to Reuel to stay in Midian (Ex. 2:21), God dissolved his vow not at the Senna-bush but in Midian, with the consent of his family (Ex. 3:18)..