לֹא־יִהְיֶ֤ה כְלִי־גֶ֙בֶר֙ עַל־אִשָּׁ֔ה וְלֹא־יִלְבַּ֥שׁ גֶּ֖בֶר שִׂמְלַ֣ת אִשָּׁ֑ה כִּ֧י תוֹעֲבַ֛ת יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ כָּל־עֹ֥שֵׂה אֵֽלֶּה׃ (פ)
婦女不可穿戴男子的服飾,男子也不可穿婦女的衣服;因為凡做這些事的,都是永恆者你的上帝所憎惡的。
Rashi
לא יהיה כלי גבר על אשה THE APPAREL OF A MAN SHALL NOT BE ON A WOMAN — so that she look like a man, in order to consort with men, for this can only be for the purpose of adultery (unchastity) (cf. Sifrei Devarim 226:1; Nazir 59a).
Ibn Ezra
The passage dealing with the attire of a man is juxtaposed to the passages dealing with going out to war, because Woman was created to rear children, and if she were instead to go out among the men to war, she would eventually become involved in debauchery. For the same reason a man may not dress himself…, because otherwise a man who does not yet have a full beard could mix with women, and he could fornicate with them, without the matter becoming widely known. This passage shows us that the Israelite custom, like that of most cultures, was that men’s clothing was distinctive from women’s clothing — they were not the same. Some commentators understand this passage to be an allusion to unnatural sexual intercourse. Although there is no need for such an interpretation here, God surely detests anyone who alters God ’s design.
Rabbeinu Bahya
僅限進階版會員使用Chizkuni
僅限進階版會員使用Siftei Chakhamim
僅限進階版會員使用Rav Hirsch
僅限進階版會員使用Rashi
ולא ילבש גבר שמלת אשה NEITHER SHALL A MAN PUT ON A WOMAN’S GARMENT in order to go and stay unnoticed amongst women. Another explanation of the second part of the text is: it implies that a man should not remove the hair of the genitals and the hair beneath the arm-pit (Nazir 59a).
Siftei Chakhamim
僅限進階版會員使用Rashi
כי תועבת FOR [ALL THAT DO SO ARE] AN ABOMINATION [UNTO THE LORD THY GOD] — This implies that the Torah forbids only the wearing of a garb that leads to abomination (unchastity) (cf. Sifrei Devarim 226:1).