Talmud su Deuteronomio 22:24
וְהוֹצֵאתֶ֨ם אֶת־שְׁנֵיהֶ֜ם אֶל־שַׁ֣עַר ׀ הָעִ֣יר הַהִ֗וא וּסְקַלְתֶּ֨ם אֹתָ֥ם בָּאֲבָנִים֮ וָמֵתוּ֒ אֶת־הנער [הַֽנַּעֲרָ֗ה] עַל־דְּבַר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר לֹא־צָעֲקָ֣ה בָעִ֔יר וְאֶ֨ת־הָאִ֔ישׁ עַל־דְּבַ֥ר אֲשֶׁר־עִנָּ֖ה אֶת־אֵ֣שֶׁת רֵעֵ֑הוּ וּבִֽעַרְתָּ֥ הָרָ֖ע מִקִּרְבֶּֽךָ׃ (ס)
allora li porterete entrambi fuori dalla porta di quella città e li lapiderete con pietre che muoiono: la fanciulla, perché non piangeva, essendo in città; e l'uomo, perché ha umiliato il suo vicino'moglie; così metterai via il male da te.
Tractate Derekh Eretz Rabbah
On account of four things is the sun in eclipse;45lit. ‘smitten’. on account of an ’Ab Beth Din who died and was not fittingly mourned;46With an appropriate memorial address. on account of a betrothed maiden who cried out aloud in the city and there was none to rescue her;47Cf. Deut. 22, 24. on account of sodomy; and on account of two brothers whose blood was shed at the same time.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sotah
“A man is stoned naked, no woman is stoned naked.” For it is written232There is no such verse. Probably the reference is to Lev. 24:14: וְרָֽגְמוּ אֹתוֹ which means “they shall stone him;” this verse is quoted in Sifry zuṭa Šelaḥ 36, Babli Sanhedrin 43a., “you shall stone him,” not his garment. Rebbi Ḥaggai asked before Rebbi Yose: Is it not written233Deut. 22:24, speaking of the inhabitants of a city whose inhabitants, men and women, turn to idolatry. If the prior argument were correct, the verse would disprove the Mishnah.: “You shall stone them with stones,” does that mean “them but not their garments”? How is that? A man is not greatly degraded by this, so he is stoned naked, but a woman who would be greatly degraded by it cannot be stoned naked234There is no biblical source for the statement of the Mishnah. Since a garment would soften the blows of the stones, the agony of the man to be executed would be prolonged if he were clothed; since he probably would not mind being seen naked, it is to his advantage being executed while naked. But for a woman, the mental anguish of being naked in public would be much greater than the increased physical pain; therefore a woman has to be executed fully clothed.
The Babli Soṭa 23b refers to the argument in a very abbreviated way which presupposes the knowledge of the Yerushalmi’s argument. The original argument of the Yerushalmi is accepted in the Babli Sanhedrin 43a; in 45a the inference is attributed to R. Jehudah who requires that a woman be stoned naked. By contrast, in Sifra Qedošim Parašah 10(4), an appropriate verse is quoted, Lev. 20:2: “Every man in Israel or among the sojourners in Israel who gives of his children to the Moloch shall certainly die, the people of the land shall stone him with stone.”.
The Babli Soṭa 23b refers to the argument in a very abbreviated way which presupposes the knowledge of the Yerushalmi’s argument. The original argument of the Yerushalmi is accepted in the Babli Sanhedrin 43a; in 45a the inference is attributed to R. Jehudah who requires that a woman be stoned naked. By contrast, in Sifra Qedošim Parašah 10(4), an appropriate verse is quoted, Lev. 20:2: “Every man in Israel or among the sojourners in Israel who gives of his children to the Moloch shall certainly die, the people of the land shall stone him with stone.”.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy