Talmud su Deuteronomio 33:23

^42aThis is an alternative version of the conditions imposed by Joshua; cf. Note 16. Rebbi Tanḥum from Kefar Gun⁴³He is R. Tanḥum bar Ḥiyya from Kefar Agin (Umm Jumia S. of Lake Genezareth), a third generation Amora. in the name of Rebbi Eleazar ben Rebbi Yose: Four. One collects grasses from everywhere on condition that one not uproot. And one relieves himself behind a wall.⁴⁴In an agricultural area, even if the field is sown up to the wall; Babli Bava qamma 81a. Rebbi Eleazar ben Rebbi Yose in the name of Rebbi Tanḥum⁴⁵The names here have to be switched; the last generation Tanna Eleazar ben R. Yose cannot speak in the name of the third generation Amora R. Tanḥum.: Up to a place where he lets wind and is not heard⁴⁶From the road.. And one grazes in forests, even the tribe of Jehudah in the tribe of Naftali, and one gives Naftali an entire region South of the lake, as it is said, “lake and South of it he inherits,⁴⁷Deut. 33:23; cf. Tosephta Bava qamma 8:18, Sifry Deut. 355, Babli Bava qamma 81b. Since the territory of Naftali was the North-East corner of the Land of Israel, Joshua could not have understood the verse to mean: “West and South he inherited.” The location of Naftali therefore is validly discussed among the rules attributed to Joshua.” the words of Rebbi Yose the Galilean. Rebbi Aqiba says, “lake” is Lake Samokhonites⁴⁸Lake Huleh., “and South” is Lake Tiberias. ⁴⁹To avoid obstacles on the road, mainly in the rainy season on an unimproved road: Berakhot 2:9, Notes 347–353. And one may step to one side. Rav Jehudah in the name of Rav: Even into a field full of saffron. How? Does one have to pay or not? Since Rav Jehudah said, even into a field full of saffron, that means, one pays⁵⁰Reading of L. E: “one does not pay.” The next sentence shows that the reading of L is correct. The argument here is that saffron is so valuable that any stepping into the field causes considerable damage to the farmer; it is unconscionable that he should not be indemnified.. Rebbi La said, since Rav Jehudah said, even into a field full of saffron, that means, one does not pay⁵¹If it is a right in common law, it cannot be disputed or subjected to payment. He holds that a very valuable crop should never be planted adjacent to a public road without leaving an ample shoulder at the side of the road.. But one cannot deviate more than necessary. Let us hear from the following: ⁴⁹To avoid obstacles on the road, mainly in the rainy season on an unimproved road: Berakhot 2:9, Notes 347–353. Rabban Gamliel and Rebbi Joshua were on the road [and stepped aside because of obstacles on the road]⁵²From E, supported by the text in Berakhot. when they saw Jehudah ben Pappos, who was sinking, coming towards them. Rabban Gamliël said to Rebbi Joshua: Who is this one who makes an exhibition of himself? He answered: This is Jehudah ben Pappos, all whose deeds are done for Heaven’s sake.

Rebbi Aḥa said: Three things were said about the cup of Grace: full, decorated, and washed. All three come from one verse (Deut. 33:23): “Naphtali is satiated with goodwill, full of the blessings of the Eternal.” Satiated - decorated¹³⁸There are different lists in the Babli (51a); one also mentions “decorated” and different interpretations are given. Rav Yehudah is reported to have surrounded himself with his students when he recited Grace over a cup of wine; Rav Ḥisda surrounded the (larger) cup of benediction with smaller cups that presumably were filled with wine. This second interpretation seems to be the one original with the Yerushalmi which identifies satiated with decorated, i. e., more than enough wine to fulfill every desire., goodwill - washed¹³⁹So that everybody would willingly take the cup and drink from it. The Babli is a little more explicit and requires “rinsed and dried.”, full as its acception. Rebbi Ḥanina said, if you did so, what is written there: “West and South his inheritance,” you merit to inherit this world and the world to come¹⁴⁰This homily is given in the Babli in the name of R. Yose ben R. Ḥanina; R. Yoḥanan says that he is given boundless property. Both seem to note the incongruence of Naphtali inheriting West and South when in fact his territory was the North-Eastern corner of the Land of Israel. Hence, the allusion cannot be meant to describe his territory but is either a geographic amplification or refers to another world..