Talmud su Levitico 19:10

HALAKHAH: Rebbi Ḥiyya⁴Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba. in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: The reason of the House of Shammai (Lev. 19:10, 23:22)⁵“Do not go over your vineyard a second time, nor pick up the single berries of your vineyard; to the poor and the sojourner relinquish them.” Why does it say “relinquish,” and not “give”? “for the poor and the sojourner.” Why does the verse say, “relinquish them”? There is another relinquishing like this one. Just as this one is for the poor and not the rich, also what is spoken of elsewhere⁶Any meaning of עזב must conform with this paradigm. is for the poor and not for the rich.

Some⁶Sifra Qedošim 2(5–7). want to understand it from the verse (Lev. 19:10, 23:22) “abandon⁷Lev. 19:10: “Do not glean in your vineyard, neither collect single berries, abandon them for the poor and the stranger; I am the Eternal, your God.” Lev. 23:22: “When you are harvesting the harvest of your land, do not finish off the corner of your field during your harvest, neither collect the gleanings of your harvest, abandon them for the poor and the stranger; I am the Eternal, your God.” The implication is that peah has to be given before any further processing.,” put before them grain in its straw, fenugreek in bundles, dates in brooms⁸Dates grow in bunches that sit on the trunk; if the bunch is cut at the trunk and the dates are taken, the remainder may be used as a broom.. I might think that this also includes climbing vine and date palms, but the verse says “them⁹Only those items that are described by the term “harvest”..” What argument do you have to include these and to exclude those? After the verse included, it excluded. I include those that are not dangerous and exclude those that are dangerous¹⁰“Connected” here means “still hanging on the tree.” Then the plucking cannot be described as “harvest”. Since this derivation by inclusion and exclusion follows the method of R. Ismael, the preceding paragraph must represent the opinion of R. Aqiba..

It was stated: The gifts to the poor standing on the field about which the poor do not care⁸They did not come to collect them at the appointed times, or they did not collect them when they did come. belong to the proprietor. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya asked, may a person give the name of peah to take for himself⁹Since it was stated in Halakhah 1:6 that even a farmer who qualifies as poor has to abandon his peah to the poor in general, how can he then be authorized to take it for himself?? Rebbi Simeon bar Ioḥai stated: (Lev. 19:10,22) “Abandon them to the poor and the stranger,” not ravens and bats¹⁰It is better that food be used for humans who care about it. Since the obligation of these gifts to the poor is to “abandon” them, not to “give” them, the farmer is not required to give the value of peah, gleanings, etc., to the treasury of charities..